Mobile View
Filter Results by
Document Types
All
1 - 10 of 410 (0.29 seconds)

reliance on the Apex Court's decision in Kailash v. Nanhku and Ors. and also contended that in order ... Dominion of India and Ors. and Kailash v. Nanhku (supra). However, these are all the cases which were dealing with
Allahabad High Court
- Cites 33 - Cited by 0 -
2008 (2) AWC 1164
- S Agarwal - Full Document
Supreme Court of India Kailash vs Nanhku & Ors on 6 April, 2005 Author: R Lahoti Bench ... CASE NO.: Appeal (civil) 7000 of 2004 PETITIONER: Kailash RESPONDENT: Nanhku & Ors. DATE OF JUDGMENT: 06/04/2005 BENCH
Supreme Court of India
- Cites 24 - Cited by 210 - R Lahoti - Full Document
Court, the judgment of the Supreme Court in Kailash v. Nanhku and Ors. has been followed. There are two other ... Abdul Khayumsab v. Kumar and Ors. wherein also Kailash v. Nanhku and Ors. (supra) and Rani Kusum (Smt.) v. Kanchan
Rajasthan High Court
- Cites 10 - Cited by 0 -
RLW 2006 (2) Raj 1513
- P S Asopa - Full Document
Bench of the Hon'ble Supreme Court in Kailash v. Nanhku and Ors. , considered the nature and effect of Order ... Haji Abdul Khayumsab v. Kumar and Ors. following Kailash v. Nanhku and Rani Kusum v. Kanchan Devi (supra), the Apex
Delhi High Court
- Cites 12 - Cited by 0 -
133 (2006) DLT 510
- R Khetrapal - Full Document
Kolkata High Court (Appellete Side) Kailash vs Nanhku on 4 May, 2011 Author: Dipankar Datta ... decision reported in (2005) 4 SCC 480 (Kailash vs. Nanhku), parameters for extending the time granted by Order VIII Rule
Kolkata High Court (Appellete Side)
- Cites 4 - Cited by 0 - D Datta - Full Document
decision of the Apex Court in Kailash v. Nanhku and Ors. (2005 (4) SCC 480) ig wherein it was observed ... reference is made to ba the rulings in Kailash v. Nanhku and others , reported
Bombay High Court
- Cites 4 - Cited by 0 - Full Document
directory in nature by this Court in Kailash v. Nanhku, this Court may not exercise its discretionary jurisdiction under Article ... party to the decision in Kailash v. Nanhku which held that the provision was directory and not mandatory. But there
Kolkata High Court (Appellete Side)
- Cites 6 - Cited by 0 - S Talukdar - Full Document
following decisions: (a) (2005)4 SCC 480 (Kailash v. Nanhku & ors. ); (b) (2005)6 SCC 344 (Salem Advocate ... Supreme Court in the case of Kailash v. Nanhku & ors. , as reported in (2005)4 SCC 480, especially
Jharkhand High Court
- Cites 8 - Cited by 0 - Full Document
recent judgments may now be noticed. In Kailash v. Nanhku (2005) 4 SCC 480 it was observed: "42. Ordinarily ... party to the decision in Kailash v. Nanhku which held that the provision was directory and not mandatory. But there
Delhi High Court
- Cites 5 - Cited by 0 - S Muralidhar - Full Document
v. Union of India. (2) 2005(2) Mh.L.J. (S.C.) 775 = 2005 AIR SCW 2346, Kailash v. Nanhku ... Supreme Court held in the case of Kailash v. Nanhku and Ors. and in case of Salem Advocate Bar Association
Bombay High Court
- Cites 4 - Cited by 0 -
2006 (1) MhLj 128
- A Joshi - Full Document
Get new documents for this query in your RSS feed reader -
1  
2
3
4
5
6
7
8
9
10
Next